Evidence Hub

The Certainty of the Evidence on Plant- vs Meat-Predominant Dietary Patterns and Depression: An Umbrella Review

Lee MF, Bayes J, Moustafa AA, Moustafa AA, Storz MA, Best T

Nutrition reviews, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Context: Diets rich in plant foods are associated with reduced risk of depressive symptoms. However, previous studies have reported greater depressive symptomology in patients who follow a plant-predominant dietary pattern. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of associations of plant- and meat-predominant diets and depression have highlighted conflicting results.

Objectives: In this umbrella review we applied A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) to explore the state of evidence regarding possible associations of plant- and meat-predominant dietary patterns with depression.

Data sources: Six databases were searched from the date of inception to January 2025: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Data extraction: Data were extracted by 2 independent researchers using Covidence software.

Data analysis: The search revealed 104 studies, of which 9 met inclusion criteria. Data were synthesized and narratively grouped by plant-predominant and meat-predominant dietary patterns.

Conclusions: Five articles reported associations between plant- and meat-predominant dietary patterns and depression, 4 reported that plant-predominant dietary patterns increased depression, and 5 found conflicting or no associations. Similar systematic search terms, overlap of primary studies, and short timeframes between reviews raise concerns about the validity and scientific contribution of repeated systematic review…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free