Evidence Hub

Impact of Dietary Supplements on Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Scafuri L, Buonerba C, Strianese O, de Azambuja E, Palleschi M, Riccio V, Marotta V, Scocca C et al.

Nutrients, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dietary supplements in breast cancer patients, focusing on their impact on clinical outcomes, treatment-related side effects, and therapy adherence. Methods: Only RCTs investigating the effects of various orally administered supplements in adult breast cancer patients were included. Well-defined substances like vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and specific herbal extracts were explored. The review excluded studies solely based on dietary interventions or non-supplemental approaches. The primary outcome assessed was quality of life. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and biomarkers indicative of disease progression. Results: A total of 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this systematic review. Overall, supplementation was not associated with serious adverse events in the included trials. Vitamin D supplementation showed promise in some studies, with potential immunomodulatory and antioxidant effects, particularly when combined with other interventions. Omega-3 fatty acids and beta-glucan demonstrated potential in alleviating certain symptoms and improving quality of life. Studies on amino acids like acetyl-L-carnitine and L-arginine also yielded mixed results. Beta-glucan exhibited potential for immune-enhancing effects, while melatonin and creatine showed limited or no benefit for fatigue or muscle strength. Herbal extracts,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free