Evidence Hub

Relative Bioavailability of 5 mg BI 10773 Administered Twice Daily Compared to 10 mg BI 10773 Given Once Daily After Multiple Oral Doses in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers (an Open-label, Randomised, Crossover, Clinical Phase I Study)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2009

16 participants

Abstract

To investigate the influence of different dosage regimen (5 mg twice daily versus 10 mg once daily) on the steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BI 10773 administered orally

Conditions: Healthy.

Primary outcome: AUC (area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma) - AUCt,ss (area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval t) for 10 mg BI 10773 QD.; AUC (area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma) - AUC0-24,ss (area under the concentration-time curves of the analyte in plasma at steady-state over two dosing intervals) for 5 mg BI 10773 BID after the morning dose on Day 5.; AUCt,ss (area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval t) of BI 10773.; Cmax,ss (maximum measured concentration of the analyte in plasma at steady state over a uniform dosing interval t) of BI 10773..

Enrollment: 16 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free