Evidence Hub

How weather affects cognitive and physical outcomes in older adults

Shourick J, Lauwers-Cances V, Vellas B, Coley N, Andrieu S, and for the MAPT/IHU HealthAge Open Science study group

PloS one, 2025

1,313 participants

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain whether, in comparison to the participants' expected abilities, the weather may cause abnormally poor cognitive or physical performance. Design Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Study conducted between May, 2008, and Feb, 2011 in 13 memory centres in France and Monaco.

Participants: 1313 participants from the MAPT trial, a 5-year multicentre prevention trial, which included dementia-free individuals aged over 70 years. Participants presented subjective memory complaints, slow gait speed and/or an instrumental activity of daily living limitation.

Main outcome measures: Cognition was assessed using a composite cognitive Z-score (composed of digit symbol substitution test, free and cued selective reminding test, Mini-mental state, category fluency) and subjective memory complaints. Physical function was assessed using gait speed, the short physical performance battery (SPPB) and its components, and grip strength. Abnormally low scores were defined as an observed score that was lower than the individual's expected ability by at least the minimal clinically important difference.

Results: Higher outdoor temperature was associated with a significantly increased risk of abnormally low gait speed or SPPB (respectively OR 1.13 95% CI (1.04, 1.22) and OR 1.15 95% CI (1.03, 1.29) for 10 degrees Celsius), but did not significantly increase the risk of abnormally low cognitive function.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that weather…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,313 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free