Evidence Hub

Effects of a Remote Multimodal Intervention Involving Diet, Walking Program, and Breathing Exercise on Quality of Life Among Newly Diagnosed People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Quasi-Experimental Non-Inferiority Pilot Study

Saxby SM, Shemirani F, Crippes LJ, Ehlinger MA, Brooks L, Bisht B, Titcomb TJ, Rubenstein LM et al.

Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease, 2024

29 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Interventions involving diet, physical activity, and breathing exercises are shown to be beneficial in managing both fatigue and quality of life (QoL) related to MS; however, the impact of such interventions among people newly diagnosed with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who decline disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is unknown.

Methods: A 12-month prospective quasi-experimental non-inferiority trial recruited people newly diagnosed with CIS or RRMS who voluntarily declined DMTs (health behavior group; HB, n = 29) or followed standard of care (SOC, n = 15). Participants in the HB group were remotely coached on the study diet, moderate-intensity walking, and breathing exercises. All participants completed questionnaires validated to assess MS symptoms, including perceived mental and physical QoL (MSQOL54); fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS; and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS); mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS); and cognitive function (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire, PDQ).

Results: During the 12 months, the HB group experienced improvement in scores for mental QoL (MSQOL54 - Mental, 0.24, 95% CI 0.01, 0.47; p = 0.04), fatigue (Total MFIS, -7.26, 95% CI -13.3,-1.18; p = 0.02), and perceived cognitive function (Total PDQ, PDQ-Attention, PDQ-Promemory, and PDQ-Planning, p ≤ 0.03 for all). A between-group difference was observed only for PDQ-Planning (p = 0.048). Non-inferiority analysis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free