Evidence Hub

Bioequivalence of a Fixed Dose Combination Tablet of Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Compared With the Free Combination of Empagliflozin Tablet and Linagliptin Tablet in Healthy Male and Female Subjects (an Open-label, Randomised, Single-dose, Crossover Study)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2016

56 participants

Abstract

The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the bioequivalence of one fixed dose combination tablet of empagliflozin/linagliptin (Test, T) compared with the free combination of one empagliflozin tablet and one linagliptin tablet (Reference, R) administered as single dose under fasted conditions.

Conditions: Healthy.

Primary outcome: AUC0-tz (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of Empagliflozin in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point); AUC0-72 (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of Linagliptin in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 to 72 Hours); Cmax (Maximum Measured Concentration of Empagliflozin Analyte in Plasma); Cmax (Maximum Measured Concentration of Linagliptin Analyte in Plasma).

Enrollment: 56 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free