Evidence Hub

Relative Bioavailability of Both BI 10773 and Warfarin and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin After Co-administration Compared to Multiple Oral Doses of BI 10773 (25 mg Once Daily) and a Single Oral Dose of Warfarin (25 mg) Alone in Healthy Male Volunteers (an Open-label, Crossover, Clinical Phase I Study)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED

18 participants

Abstract

The objective of the current study is to investigate the bioavailability of BI 10773 and of warfarin after concomitant multiple oral administration of BI 10773 and a single oral dose of warfarin in comparison to BI 10773 and warfarin given alone, and to investigate the pharmacodynamics of a single oral dose of warfarin with and without concomitant multiple oral administration of BI 10773.

Conditions: Healthy.

Primary outcome: Empagliflozin: Area Under the Curve for the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτ,ss); Empagliflozin: Maximum Measured Concentration at Steady State(Cmax,ss); Warfarin R-enantiomers: Area Under the Curve 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞); Warfarin R-enantiomers: Maximum Measured Concentration (Cmax); Warfarin S-enantiomers: Area Under the Curve 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞); Warfarin S-enantiomers: Maximum Measured Concentration (Cmax).

Enrollment: 18 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free