Evidence Hub

Current state of nutritional psychiatry: A scoping review of randomized controlled trials

Nagamine T

World journal of methodology, 2025

Abstract

Background: Nutritional psychiatry is a rapidly expanding field of research, with mounting evidence suggesting that nutritional factors may play a role in the development of psychiatric disorders.

Aim: To examine the level of evidence for nutritional psychiatry.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to assess the current state of nutritional psychiatry, including a search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results: The review identified a total of seven papers, with many concentrating on the relationship between depression and the gut microbiome. A salient issue that emerged from this review was the paucity of sample size in many studies. The inherent complexity of nutritional studies, characterized by a multitude of potential factors and exposures that often act as confounders, poses significant challenges to the development of effective RCT designs. The analysis revealed that probiotics, though demonstrating efficacy, exhibited a modest effect size.

Conclusion: Conducting RCTs with effective markers is imperative from these studies. The implementation of Mendelian randomization and the investigation of mechanisms in basic research are essential complementary approaches.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free