Evidence Hub

Kynurenine pathway metabolites are increased in inflammatory depression and decrease with omega-3 treatment

Jesper Lindahl, Gustav Söderberg Veibäck, Klara Suneson, Wilma Blanking, Johanna Tjernberg, Darya Ståhl, Å. Wiman, F. Ventorp et al.

Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health, 2026

170 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Activation of the kynurenine pathway (KP) with resulting accumulation of neuroactive metabolites may be a downstream pathophysiological mechanism of inflammatory depression. The aims of this study were to investigate KP metabolites in inflammatory depression compared to non-inflammatory depression and healthy controls, and whether these metabolites change with nutraceutical interventions with potential KP-modulating effects. We combined data from two antidepressant clinical trials: one with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) and one with a Limosilactobacillus reuteri probiotic supplement as the active intervention. Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (n = 170) were stratified at baseline according to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels into an inflammatory (hs-CRP ≥1 mg/L, n = 127) and a non-inflammatory (hs-CRP <1 mg/L, n = 43) group. We also included 80 non-depressed healthy controls (HC). We investigated between-group differences in KP metabolites at baseline, treatment-associated changes in these biomarkers and how they relate to clinical response. At baseline, the inflammatory depression group had significantly elevated levels of quinolinic acid (QUIN) (p < 0.01), 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK) (p < 0.05), and kynurenine (p < 0.05) levels compared to both non-inflammatory depression and HCs. N-3 PUFAs, but not probiotics or placebo, significantly decreased QUIN (p < 0.05) and 3-HK (p < 0.05). Higher baseline levels and a larger…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 170 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free