Evidence Hub

Seafood-Derived Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Mutiu A. Alabi, Hameedat I. Yusuf, Oluwafemi O. Adebara, Emmanuel O. Ajani

Researchers Journal of Science and Technology, 2026

149,051 participants

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death globally, representing 32 % of all deaths and necessitating effective preventive strategies. Despite widespread interest in omega-3 fatty acids for cardiovascular protection, conflicting evidence from randomized trials has created uncertainty regarding optimal formulations (EPA vs. EPA+DHA), efficacy, and risk-benefit profiles. This systematic review addresses critical knowledge gaps by synthesizing randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence through 2024, providing formulation-specific comparison between EPA monotherapy and EPA+DHA combinations, as well as integrating comprehensive atrial fibrillation risk assessment. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2024 using comprehensive Boolean search strategies, identifying 38 RCTs involving 149,051 participants. Two independent reviewers performed both study selection and data extraction work. The researchers used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool to determine the risk of bias assessment. The meta-analysis used random-effects models to measure statistical diversity through I² statistics. GRADE methodology evaluated certainty of evidence. Omega-3 supplementation significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.93, 95 % CI: 0.88-0.98; moderate certainty evidence), non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.81-0.93; moderate certainty), coronary heart disease events (RR 0.91, 95 % CI: 0.87-0.96; moderate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 149,051 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free