Evidence Hub

Short-Term Performance Assay Identifies Functional Benefits and Early Toxicity of Longevity Interventions in Mice

Marín-Jerez E, Rueda-Carrasco J, Meléndez-Rodríguez F, Partido-Borge P, Tapia E, Leibowitz BD, Parras A

Research Square, 2026

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Mouse lifespan studies are slow and costly, limiting the number of interventions that have demonstrated robust anti-aging effects. This highlights the need for rapid early-stage screening tools capable of assessing both efficacy and potential side effects. Here, we present a short-term performance assay designed to rapidly profile functional benefits and early toxicity of longevity interventions in mice. Over an 8-week period, mice received one of five candidate anti-aging treatments: 17α-estradiol, rapamycin + Smer28, berberine + resveratrol, sildenafil and pinealon. The protocol longitudinally monitored body weight and temperature, and food intake, alongside post-treatment assessments of grip strength, locomotor activity, Y-maze cognition, social behavior, and hematological and urinary parameters. The screen revealed compound-specific phenotypes: 17α-estradiol induced significant weight loss, increased grip strength, and dorsal alopecia, consistent with metabolic remodeling. Sildenafil reduced basal body temperature and preserved locomotor activity. Berberine + resveratrol decreased food intake and fasting glucose without major changes in physical performance, resembling caloric restriction-like metabolic effects. Rapamycin + Smer28 modestly improved strength and sociability but induced anemia in 2 of 5 mice, indicating potential dose-dependent toxicity. Pinealon showed a trend toward improved working memory without detectable adverse effects. This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free