Evidence Hub

Vardenafil efficacy for the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

El-Hindi S

World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2026

37 participants

Abstract

Background: Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) remains a challenging condition with high morbidity and mortality despite advancements in management, which implies the need to investigate new therapies. While sildenafil is the drug of choice in resource-limited centers and for patients unresponsive to inhaled nitric oxide, alternative phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors like vardenafil may offer superior efficacy.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of vardenafil in the management of persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel clinical trial was conducted at Children's Hospital, Damascus University. Fifty-five newborns (32 females and 23 males, n = 18) or 0.4 mg/kg/day oral vardenafil (n = 37). Recruitment lasted from May 2023 until September 2024. Clinical and echocardiographic findings were monitored daily from diagnosis until pulmonary pressure normalization.

Results: The vardenafil group showed more rapid improvement. Pulmonary hypertension decreased significantly in the vardenafil group after 1 and 2 days (P = 0.002 and P P = 0.001 and P = 0.015 respectively). Additionally, pulmonary artery flow velocity increased more in the vardenafil group after 1 day and 2 days (P = 0.046 and P = 0.048 respectively) and respiratory distress scores improved more in the vardenafil group after 2 days and 3 days of treatment (P = 0.048 and P = 0.004 respectively). No adverse events were reported in either treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free