Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aris Liakos, Thomas Karagiannis, Eleni A. Athanasiadou, Maria Sarigianni, Maria Mainou, Konstantinos Papatheodorou, Eleni Bekiari, Απόστολος Τσάπας

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 2014

6,203 participants · 225 citations

Abstract

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of the novel sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin compared with placebo or other antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library through December 2013 and grey literature. Two reviewers working independently extracted relevant data and carried out risk-of-bias assessments. We synthesized results using random-effects models and computed weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: We included 10 studies with 6203 participants. Compared with placebo, mean changes in haemoglobin A1c were -0.62% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.68 to -0.57%] for empagliflozin 10 mg and -0.66% (-0.76 to -0.57%) for empagliflozin 25 mg. Empagliflozin 25 mg daily had glycaemic efficacy similar to metformin or sitagliptin (WMD -0.11%; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.03%), without increasing risk for hypoglycaemia. It was also associated with body weight loss (WMD -1.84; 95% CI -2.30 to -1.38 kg vs. placebo) and had a favourable effect on blood pressure. Incidence of hypoglycaemia with empagliflozin was similar to placebo (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.39); nevertheless we noted an increased risk for genital tract infections (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.55 to 7.09). Findings were similar for the 10-mg dosing regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin effectively lowers blood glucose and provides…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,203 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free