Evidence Hub

Treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil

Leonard S. Marks, Catherine Duda, Frederick J. Dorey, Maria Luz Macairan, Paul Bryan C. Santos

Urology, 1999

100 participants · 106 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in a clinical practice setting; to evaluate the correlation between patient and partner perceptions of treatment outcomes; and to assess the relation between the severity of ED and response to treatment.

METHODS: Among the first 100 men to receive sildenafil in a urology practice setting, 74 (mean + SD age 64+/-11 years) completed a validated sexual function questionnaire (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) before and after a 4 to 6-week treatment period. A modified version of the same questionnaire was independently completed by partners. ED was categorized into a severity class of I to IV.

RESULTS: Sildenafil treatment improved erections by 71% to 95%, according to responses in key IIEF questions 3 and 4. Overall, 57 (77%) of 74 patients desired to continue treatment after the test period. Patient score on the IIEF was correlated with partner score on the modified questionnaire before and after treatment (r = 0.67 to 0.81, P <0.01). IIEF scores were reflected in a simple severity classification system. Men with the best preservation of erections (severity class I) exhibited the best responses to sildenafil, whereas men with no erections (severity class IV) were much less likely to respond to the drug and desire continuation of treatment (P <0.01). Patients with a radical prostatectomy were relatively refractory to sildenafil, except for 2 of 5 who had undergone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free