Evidence Hub

Sildenafil for adult Asian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shi Q, Wang Z, Yang N, Ma Y, Chen Y, Wei H, Yao H

Annals of palliative medicine, 2022

480 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with untreated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has historically been poor. Previous studies have recommended that sildenafil was beneficial, but the dose varies greatly. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sildenafil [dose: 20 mg/three times a day (TID)] for adult Asian PAH patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang Data) were searched from their inception to January 2022. We recruited all randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of interventions that compared sildenafil (20 mg/TID) versus placebo or symptomatic treatment for adult Asian PAH patients.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 480 participants were included. Compared to symptomatic treatment, sildenafil-treated patients were more likely to walk 57.68 meters further in six-minute walk distance [mean difference (MD) =57.68 m, 95% confidence interval (CI): 41.55 to 73.81], achieve an improvement in systemic arterial oxygen saturation (MD =2.48%, 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.71), and increase the score of the Borg scale for dyspnea (MD =-0.99 points, 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.53). The total number of patients with World Health Organization class III and IV also exhibited a downtrend. Compared to the placebo, sildenafil was associated with a reduction in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (MD =-4.13 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.52 to -1.74) and the level of brain natriuretic peptide…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 480 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free