Evidence Hub

Presence of sibutramine and sildenafil in weight loss dietary supplements: a case series with analytical and clinical investigation

Marie Carles, T. Pietri, Joëlle Micallef, Clara Corteggiani-Giraud, M. Richez, Caroline Solas-Chesneau, Bruno Lacarelle, N. Fabresse

Clinical toxicology, 2025

29 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The use of weight loss supplements is increasing, often driven by online marketing. However, many of these supplements are adulterated with undeclared pharmaceutical substances, potentially posing significant health risks. We investigated the presence of sibutramine and sildenafil in weight loss supplements and assessed the associated clinical outcomes. Materials and methods A total of 12 weight loss supplement samples (capsules, tea, and coffee bags) were analyzed using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Demographic and clinical data were collected by the Marseille Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre from 29 patients who reported using these products. Results All samples were found to contain sibutramine, with concentrations ranging from 7.5 mg to 15.4 mg per unit. Sildenafil was detected in all samples, with concentrations ranging from 1.7 mg to 4.8 mg per unit. Clinical data from 29 users showed significant weight loss, with an average of 7.5 kg after 37 days of use. Adverse effects included anorexia (n = 15), tachycardia (n = 13), insomnia (n = 2) and chest pain (n = 4). In some cases, more serious effects such as seizures and dependence were observed. Discussion Both sibutramine and sildenafil were withdrawn from the market due to cardiovascular risks. As such, the unregulated use of these products pose a serious risk to public health, particularly in individuals with underlying cardiovascular disease. Conclusion We detected…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free