Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of intracavernosal incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) as add-on therapy to sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction insufficiently responsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors

Giuliano F, Denormandie AC, Madec FX, Carnicelli D, Graziana JP, Droupy S, Marcelli F, Gassama M et al.

Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2025

226 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest intracavernosal botulinum toxin A (BTX/A) could improve difficult-to-treat erectile dysfunction (ED) ie with an insufficient response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is).

AIM

To investigate efficacy and safety of intracavernosal injection (ICI) of BTX/A combined with sildenafil 100 mg on demand in patients with ED and insufficient response to PDE5-Is.

METHODS

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of bilateral 0.5 ml ICIs of incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U or placebo, both combined with sildenafil 100 mg on demand in men with ED and insufficient response to sildenafil 100 mg on demand. The inclusion criteria were International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score 50% of attempts at sexual intercourse unsuccessful during a 4-week open-label run-in phase with sildenafil 100 mg on demand.

OUTCOMES

Mean change in IIEF-EF score and the proportion of "Yes" responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP)-Q2 (ability to penetrate) and SEP-Q3 (ability to maintain an erection for successful intercourse) at 3 months.

RESULTS

Out of 226 patients screened, 165 patients were randomized (mean age: 60.1 years, mean IIEF-EF on sildenafil 100 mg: 11.1). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed no significant improvement in IIEF-EF score with incobotulinumtoxinA 100 U combined with sildenafil 100 mg at 3 months. IncobotulinumtoxinA 100 U improved penetration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 226 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free