Evidence Hub

Differential Acute Kidney Injury Profiles of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is: A Network Meta-Analysis

Liang CS, Hsu CW, Chen JJ, Hung CM, Zeng BY, Yang WC, Suen MW, Wang HY et al.

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

199,877 participants

Abstract

Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have demonstrated protective effects against chronic kidney disease, their impact on acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear. AKI and chronic kidney disease share overlapping clinical features but differ in pathogenesis and risk profiles. Previous analyses often grouped diverse agents into single categories, potentially concealing medication-specific renal risks. Given the widespread assumption of renoprotection, particularly among newer agents, there is a need to evaluate the comparative AKI risk of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is at the individual drug and dose level. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) following Cochrane-recommended methodology for safety-focused assessments. A systematic literature search across eight databases identified 67 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 199,877 participants. Eligible trials reported AKI outcomes or sufficiently explicit acute renal injury-related events associated with GLP-1RA or SGLT2i interventions. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI; all-cause dropout was analyzed as a general tolerability measure. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated, and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to estimate relative safety rankings. Only high-dose tirzepatide (10-15 mg/week) was associated with a significantly increased risk of AKI compared to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 199,877 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free