Evidence Hub

Cost-effective Treatment of Unexplained Infertility: A Prospective Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomised Controlled Study

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2024

900 participants

Abstract

The issue of unexplained infertility that Southam brought up in 1960 is still a problem today. Despite improvements in infertility assessment, many couples still don't know why they are infertile. Even with the use of the most advanced ovulation detectors, fallopian tube patency tests, and semen evaluations, competency cannot identify every potential flaw in the intricate processes leading to conception. Unexplained infertility will be a challenge for both biological and clinical researchers since it results from these gaps in our understanding of fertilization and from our incapacity to use all of the current evidence-based information.

Conditions: Unexplained Infertility.

Primary outcome: Pregnancy outcome.

Enrollment: 900 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 900 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free