Evidence Hub

The Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) Consensus Statements for the Management of Reproductive Issues in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

Ravindran V, Radhakrishna MH, Kayidhi S, Hoi A, Hsieh CI, Barrett CAM, Alnaimat F, Park JS et al.

International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Background: The management of reproductive health in individuals with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) has evolved into a primary clinical priority. Wide variations in clinical practice and drug availability in the Asia-Pacific regions necessitate localized frameworks. These consensus statements, developed by the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) Special Interest Group for Women's Health & Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, aim to bridge the gaps within the region, foster multidisciplinary collaboration, and address regional knowledge deficits.

Methods: An expert panel comprising 16 members of the 13 APLAR member nation organizations formulated 23 research questions using the PICO framework. A systematic review of English-language literature up to July 2025 was conducted across the MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, supplemented by a manual search of journals from the APLAR regions. Evidence from the APLAR region was appraised using the GRADE system. A modified Delphi online voting process was employed to reach consensus, pre-defined as ≥ 75% agreement.

Results: The panel approved four overarching principles and 86 statements, organized into 16 broad categories. These statements cover all three phases of pregnancy in AIRDs, the safety of medications during pregnancy and lactation, contraception, assisted reproductive techniques, fertility preservation, and hormonal replacement therapy,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free