Evidence Hub

Analytical Methods for the Quantification of Drugs and Their Metabolites in Human Hair: A Systematic Review From 2010 to 2025

Elluard M, Miri L, Caron N, Bussières JF

Drug testing and analysis, 2026

Abstract

Hair has emerged as a valuable biological matrix for documenting long-term or cumulative drug exposure. Although hair analysis is well established in forensic toxicology, its potential application to monitor occupational exposure to hazardous drugs among healthcare workers remains unexplored. This systematic review aimed to describe analytical methods used for drug quantification in human hair and to assess the feasibility of applying this approach to hazardous drug exposure monitoring. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted for studies published between January 2010 and March 2025 using the terms hair, matrix, drug, and analysis. Eligible studies reported quantitative measurements of drugs or metabolites in human hair. Data on study characteristics, analytical methods, and results (LOD, LOQ, concentration range in ng/mg) were extracted and descriptively analyzed. One hundred thirteen studies were included, mainly from Europe, most addressing forensic toxicology (77/113). The vertex posterior region was the preferred sampling site. Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with methanol and LC-MS/MS were the predominant analytical approaches, providing the lowest LODs and LOQs. A total of 233 analytes (152 drugs and 81 metabolites) were identified, mainly antidepressants, opioids, and antipsychotics. Only one study assessed a hazardous drug (soluble platinum compounds): Exposed workers showed median platinum levels of 3.24 versus 2.17 pg/mg in unexposed staff…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free