Evidence Hub

Cilostazol in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction-The CLIP-HFpEF trial

Aiad N, du Fay de Lavallaz J, Zhang MJ, Chaikijurajai T, Ye B, Nijjar PS, Lahiri JA, Martin CM et al.

ESC heart failure, 2025

23 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Background and aims: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) tend to have low resting and exercise heart rates. Phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE-3) inhibitors improve heart rates, haemodynamics and symptoms in patients with HFpEF. Cilostazol is an oral PDE-3 inhibitor used in peripheral artery disease. This study thought to evaluate the short-term effects of cilostazol on health status, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and mechanisms of action.

Methods: The effect of cilostazol was evaluated in 23 patients with HFpEF in a randomized placebo controlled multiple crossover trial (CLIP-HFpEF). Participants received placebo or cilostazol for 1 week followed by three crossovers to the alternate assignment at weeks 2, 3 and 4. The primary endpoint was the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) overall summary score obtained at the end of each treatment period. NT-proBNP was the secondary endpoint. In an exploratory mechanistic analysis, pulmonary artery (PA) pressures and heart rates were followed amongst the five participants with implanted pressure monitors.

Results: Cilostazol improved the KCCQ score by 4.8 points (95% confidence interval, 2.0-7.7, P = 0.003). NT-proBNP levels were 448 (154-1056) pg/mL on placebo and 375 (68-974) pg/mL on cilostazol (P = 0.006). In patients with PA pressure monitors, diastolic pressure was 20.5 (18.7-23.0) mmHg on placebo and 18.0 (17.0-20.0) mmHg on cilostazol, an effect linked to higher…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free