Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Sildenafil in Combination with Dapagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin Monotherapy in the Management of Heart Failure with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial

E. Abdallah, Marwa Kamal, K. Elkhashab, M. A. Mohamed, A. Binsaleh, Marwa Mohsen, R. R. S. Hussein

Pharmaceuticals, 2025

93 participants

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) with pulmonary hypertension due to left-sided heart disease (PH-LHD) is associated with poor prognosis. Dapagliflozin showed benefits in terms of ejection fraction (EF); meanwhile, sildenafil improved pulmonary pressures and right ventricular function in PH -LHD in recent clinical studies. This study assesses the potential additive effects of dapagliflozin and sildenafil on cardiac function and pulmonary hemodynamics in this population. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 93 participating patients with HF and PH-LHD were randomly assigned to receive dapagliflozin (control group, n = 48) or dapagliflozin plus sildenafil 25 mg/day (test group, n = 45) in addition to conventional therapy for HF for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were assessing changes in echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters. Secondary outcomes included outcomes, changes in cardiac enzyme (troponin), kidney function (serum creatinine), and lipid profile. Results: The average baseline median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for both groups was 30%, and the Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) median was 50 mmHg. At follow-up, PASP had declined, and EF had improved compared to baseline. However, there were no statistically noticeable variations between the groups (p = 0.458, 0.331, respectively). No notable changes were observed in secondary and safety outcomes, including hospitalization rate, number of deaths, kidney function, and cardiac…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 93 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free