Evidence Hub

Prenatal high-dose vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone mineral content and density at age 13 years: a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial

Brustad N, Sultan T, Vahman N, Jensen SK, Vinding R, Aagaard K, Gørtz PM, Haarmark C et al.

The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026

584 participants

Abstract

Summary Background We previously demonstrated effect of maternal high-dose vitamin D supplementation on offspring bone health in preschool-age children. However, it is unknown whether this effect is long-lasting. Methods We investigated the effect of 2800 (high-dose) vs. 400 (placebo + standard-dose) IU/day of gestational vitamin D supplementation on the prespecified secondary outcomes (bone mineral content and density (BMC and BMD)) at age 13 years and longitudinally (age 3, 6 and 13 years) in a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial (RCT) (NCT00856947) of 584 children in COPSAC2010. In addition, we investigated the risk of radiologically verified fractures age 0–13 years in a post hoc analysis. Findings In 416 children (71%) with a DXA scan at age 13 years, there were no differences in a linear regression model in total body BMC (6.7 (−28.3:41.6), p = 0.71) or total body BMD (−0.003 (−0.017:0.011), p = 0.68) among children in the high-dose (n = 212) vs. standard-dose vitamin D group (n = 204). In sensitivity analyses stratified by sex, birth season or maternal pre-interventional vitamin D levels there were no differences between the intervention groups. A mixed effects model of DXA scans from age 3, 6 and 13 years combined also showed no effects and there was no effect on fracture risk until age 13 years in a Cox (time to first) or Quasi-Poisson (incidence) regression model. Interpretation This 13-year follow-up of a prespecified secondary outcome of the COPSAC2010…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 584 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free