Evidence Hub

Perioperative NSAID use and postoperative outcomes after distal radius fracture surgery: a propensity-matched cohort study

Dinesh A, Fahmy S, Poursalehian M, Marjoua Y, Cereijo C, Billow D, Peirish R, Padubidri A et al.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026

76,913 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain management following distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery, yet their effects on postoperative complications remain unclear. This study evaluated the association between perioperative prescriptive NSAID use and surgical and medical complications following DRF surgery.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database identified adult patients who underwent DRF surgery between 2012 and 2024. Patients were categorized based on NSAID prescription within 1 day before to 1 month after surgery. Propensity score matching controlled for demographic variables. Primary outcome was 1-year surgical complications (malunion/nonunion surgery, postoperative infection, and revision surgery). Secondary outcomes included 90-day medical complications (myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute kidney injury, emergency department visits, and readmission). Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: Among 76,913 patients identified, 30,760 matched pairs were analyzed. The primary outcome of malunion/nonunion surgery at 1 year showed no significant difference after matching. At 1 year, NSAID prescription patients had significantly higher rates of postoperative infection and revision surgery. Within 90 days, NSAID prescription patients demonstrated higher emergency department visit rates but no significant differences in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 76,913 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free