Evidence Hub

The impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in rodents

Theofilis P, Sagris M, Oikonomou E, Antonopoulos AS, Siasos G, Tsioufis K, Tousoulis D

International immunopharmacology, 2022

104 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) has received remarkable attention due to the beneficial effects observed in diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and kidney disease. Several mechanisms have been proposed for these pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory ones. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on inflammatory markers in experimental models.

METHODS: A literature search was conducted to detect studies examining the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on inflammatory markers [interleukin-6 (IL-6), C reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)]. Consequently, a meta-analysis of the included studies was performed, assessing the differences in the levels of the inflammatory markers between the treatment groups as its primary outcome. Moreover, risk of bias, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were evaluated.

RESULTS: The systematic literature review yielded 30 studies whose meta-analysis suggested that treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor resulted in decreases of IL-6 [standardized mean difference (SMD): -1.56, 95% CI -2.06 to -1.05), CRP (SMD: -2.17, 95% CI -2.80 to -1.53), TNF-α (SMD: -1.75, 95% CI -2.14 to -1.37), and MCP-1 (SMD: -2.04, 95% CI -2.91 to -1.17). The effect on CRP and TNF-α was of lesser magnitude in cases of empagliflozin use. Moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity and possible publication bias were noted. The findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free