Evidence Hub

Dietary phylloquinone depletion and repletion in postmenopausal women: effects on bone and mineral metabolism

Martini LA, Booth SL, Saltzman E, do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre M, Wood RJ

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2006

21 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vitamin K has been implicated in increased bone fracture risk. Despite a potential role of vitamin K in bone, little is known about the effects of altered dietary phylloquinone intake on the underlying components of bone and mineral metabolism.

METHODS: A 84-day in-house dietary phylloquinone (vitamin K) depletion-repletion study was undertaken in 21 postmenopausal women (mean age: 70 years) to assess the effects of altered vitamin K status on intestinal calcium (Ca) absorption, urinary and serum Ca and phosphorus (P), serum calcemic hormones, and serum biomarkers of bone turnover [osteocalcin and N-telopeptide type 1 collagen cross-links (NTx)] and the response to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D treatment (1 microg/dayx7 d).

RESULTS: The group receiving calcitriol treatment (n=11) had higher Ca absorption, urinary Ca, urinary and serum P and serum osteocalcin and lower serum parathyroid hormone (PTH). There were no significant effects of acute (4-week) phylloquinone depletion on response to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D treatment or on measures of bone formation or mineral metabolism. However, phylloquinone treatment had a significant effect (p<0.04) on serum NTx. Phylloquinone repletion, up to five times (450 microg phylloquinone per day) the currently recommended adequate intake level of dietary phylloquinone for women, significantly reduced serum NTx (16.8+/-0.9 nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per liter following repletion vs 18.4+/-1.1 nmol BCE per liter following…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free