Evidence Hub

Antiresorption therapy and reduction in fracture susceptibility in the osteoporotic elderly patient: open study

Muscoso E, Puglisi N, Mamazza C, Lo Giudice F, Testai M, Abbate S, Santangelo A, Panebianco P et al.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2004

1,000 participants

Abstract

The identification of risk factors for osteoporosis has been an essential step towards the understanding of the onset of the disease as well as of the osteoporosis-related fractures due to bone fragility. The present study has been aimed at assessing whether a correlation may exist between the increment in bone mass, consequent to an antiresorption therapy, and the reduction in the incidence of fractures. Moreover, the possibility that such a reduction might result from the action of other factors, such as the changes in bone microstructure, has been investigated. A total of 2,000 osteoporotic women (mean age: 68 +/- 9 years) were enrolled in the study and divided at random into 4 treatment groups. Each group received one of the following treatments: Alendronate 10 mg/daily (1,000 patients), Clodronate 100 mg/weekly i.m. (800 patients), Risedronate 5 mg/dailt (100 patients), and Raloxifene 60 mg/daily (100 patients). Clinical evaluation was based on bone mineral density (BMD) assay on lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) by means of a DEXA (Lunar DPX) mineralometer, as well as on the incidence of fractures following both 12- and 24-month treatment periods. The results showed an overlapping pattern in patients treated with Alendronate or Risedronate, namely a significant increment in BMD after a 24-month treatment period, whereas such an increment in BMD was less evident in patients receiving either Clodronate or Risedronate after a 24-month treatment period. In addition, a total of 18…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free