Evidence Hub

Alendronate versus calcitriol for the prevention of bone loss after cardiac transplantation

Shane E, Addesso V, Namerow PB, McMahon DJ, Lo SH, Staron RB, Zucker M, Pardi S et al.

The New England journal of medicine, 2004

149 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a well-known complication of cardiac transplantation. We conducted a randomized trial comparing alendronate with calcitriol for the prevention of bone loss during the first year after cardiac transplantation.

METHODS: A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to receive either alendronate (10 mg per day) or calcitriol (0.5 microg per day) a mean (+/-SD) of 21+/-11 days after transplantation. Estimates of bone loss and the incidence of fractures among untreated patients were obtained from a reference group of 27 prospectively recruited patients who received cardiac transplants within the same period as the intervention groups.

RESULTS: At one year, the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine had decreased by a mean of 0.7 percent in the alendronate group and 1.6 percent in the calcitriol group (P=0.25 for the test of no difference). The bone mineral density at the femoral neck decreased by a mean of 1.7 percent in the alendronate group and 2.1 percent in the calcitriol group (P=0.69). In the reference group, the mean bone mineral density at the lumbar spine decreased by 3.2 percent (P=0.03 for the comparison with the alendronate group; P=0.15 for the comparison with the calcitriol group), and the mean density at the femoral neck decreased by 6.2 percent (P=0.001 for comparisons with both intervention groups). The incidence of vertebral fractures did not differ significantly among the groups (6.8 percent in the alendronate group, 3.6 percent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 149 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free