Evidence Hub

Sparfloxacin vs. Levofloxacin for Urinary Tract Infection: Clinical Observation

Ru-Pin Liu

Zhongguo yiyuan yongyao pingjia yu fenxi, 2007

86 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical efficacy and safety of Sparfloxacin vs.Levofloxacin in the treatment of simple urinary tract infection.METHODS: A total of 86 patients with simple urinary tract infection were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial: the trial group(group A,n=44) were assigned to orally take Sparfloxacin qd for 7d,and the control group(group B,n=42) to orally take levofloxacin 200mg bid for 7d.RESULTS: Numbers of cases with recovery,excellent efficacy,improvement,and inefficacy and the effective rate,recovery rate,and clearance rate of bacteria in group A were 26,13,4,1,88.64%,59.1%,and 86.5.0%,respectively,and those for group B were 24,12,4,2,85.71%,57.1%,and 85.2%,respectively.There were no significant differences between two groups(P0.05).The incidences of adverse effects of group A vs.group B were 11.36% vs.9.52%(P0.05).CONCLUSION: Sparfloxacin is effective for simple urinary tract infection with curative efficacy and safety similar to those of levofloxacin.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 86 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free