Evidence Hub

Balofloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of 215 cases of bacterial infections in urinary system lower respiratory tract

Xiao-Juan Xin

Chongqing Yike Daxue xuebao, 2010

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of balofloxacin in the treatment of bacterial infections in urinary system. Methods:A total of Two-hundred and twenty-nine patients with respiratory infections were enrolled in this multicenter,randomized controlled clinical study.One-hundred and five patients as trial group received balofloxacin and One-hundred and ten patients as control group received levofloxacin.Both groups were given drug 0.1g twice daily,period for 5 to 14 days.Results:The cure and effective rates were 77.1%and 96.2%,respectively in balofloxacin group,81.8%and 97.3%,respectively in levofloxacin group;the bacterial culture-positive rates were in balofloxacin and levofloxacin group 78%and 77.3%,respectively;the bacterial eradication rates were 95.1%and 94.1%,respectively;the adverse events rate were 8.2%and 8.9%,respectively.There were no significant differences between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion:Balofloxacin is as effective and well-tolerated as levofloxacin for the treatment of bacterial infections in urinary system respiratory tract.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free