Evidence Hub

The efficacy and safety of Empagliflozin on outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alizadehasl A, Hakimian H, Abdolkarimi L, Afsari Zonooz Y, Amini-Salehi E, Hosseini Jebelli SF, Yalameh Aliabadi A

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025

31 citations

Abstract

Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, has garnered significant interest due to its potential cardiovascular benefits, particularly in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Empagliflozin in improving clinical outcomes in this patient population. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the effects of Empagliflozin on clinical outcomes in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and the Scientific Information Database, were searched up to July 31, 2024. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria. Data analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3, with outcomes expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that Empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to placebo, with a risk ratio of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.23-0.99; P = 0.049), indicating a 52% reduction in hospitalization risk. However, secondary outcomes showed that Empagliflozin was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.06-3.02; P = 0.415) and the need for coronary revascularization…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free