Evidence Hub

1044Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTI) caused by Levofloxacin-resistant Pathogens: Results from the ASPECT-cUTI Trial

George Sakoulas, Obiamiwe Umeh, Jennifer L. Huntington, Daniel J. Cloutier, Judith N. Steenbergen, Guojun Yuan, Minjung Yoon, Ellie J. C. Goldstein

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2014

1,083 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrates excellent activity in vitro against Gram-negative pathogens, including extended spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in the subset of patients with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, caused by levofloxacin (LVX)-resistant pathogens was examined from pooled efficacy data of 2 Phase 3, randomized, controlled, double-blind trials (NCT01345929 and NCT01345955). Methods. Hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with pyuria and clinical symptoms of cUTI were randomized to either intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam 1.5 g every 8 hours or intravenous LVX 750 mg/day for 7 days, prior to availability of susceptibility data. Primary outcome was the composite microbiological eradication and clinical cure (composite cure) rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 5-9 days after the end of therapy in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) and microbiologically evaluable (ME) populations. Results. A total of 1083 patients were enrolled, 800 were included in the mMITT population, and 212 had LVX-resistant baseline uropathogens; 176/212 were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated significantly higher composite cure rates and per-pathogen microbiological eradication rates vs LVX in the mMITT and ME populations (Table). Conclusion. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated superior composite cure rates vs LVX in cUTI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,083 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free