Evidence Hub

Impact of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin on sudden cardiac death: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjudicated randomized evidence

Matteucci A, Pandozi C, Bonanni M, Mariani MV, Sgarra L, Nesti L, Pierucci N, La Fazia VM et al.

Heart rhythm, 2026

58,569 participants · 40 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular outcomes in the spectrum of cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome. Albeit basic and translational evidence support a putative anti-arrhythmic role, at the clinical level, a lack of consensus has emerged across different studies, and the true impact on sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the effect of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin on SCD in patients with type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on randomized controlled trials. A total of 58,569 participants from 8 trials were included, with 30,565 patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and 28,104 controls assigned to placebo. The median follow-up period was 29 months. We performed pooled analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses to explore the impact on SCD risk across different populations and treatment regimens.

RESULTS: The pooled analysis showed a reduced risk of SCD with SGLT2 inhibitors (odds ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.94; P = .0104), with negligible heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.0000; I2 = 0.0%; Q = 3.17, P = .8687). Subgroup-specific estimates (age, follow-up duration, population, and SGLT2 inhibitor type) did not reach statistical significance. Meta-regression showed no significant moderation by mean age, study duration, or gender. No evidence of publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSION:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 58,569 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free