Evidence Hub

Dietary vitamin A intake and bone health in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study

de Jonge EA, Kiefte-de Jong JC, Campos-Obando N, Booij L, Franco OH, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Rivadeneira F et al.

European journal of clinical nutrition, 2015

5,288 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: High vitamin A intake may be associated with a decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fractures. Our objectives were to study whether dietary intake of vitamin A (total, retinol or beta-carotene) is associated with BMD and fracture risk and if associations are modified by body mass index (BMI) and vitamin D.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: Participants were aged 55 years and older (n=5288) from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based prospective cohort. Baseline vitamin A and D intake was measured by a food frequency questionnaire. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at four visits between baseline (1989-1993) and 2004. Serum vitamin D was assessed in a subgroup (n=3161). Fracture incidence data were derived from medical records with a mean follow-up time of 13.9 years.

RESULTS: Median intake of vitamin A ranged from 684 retinol equivalents (REs)/day (quintile 1) to 2000 REs/day (quintile 5). After adjustment for confounders related to lifestyle and socioeconomic status, BMD was significantly higher in subjects in the highest quintile of total vitamin A (mean difference in BMD (95% confidence interval (CI))=11.53 (0.37-22.7) mg/cm(2)) and retinol intake (mean difference in BMD (95% CI)=12.57 (1.10-24.05) mg/cm(2)) than in the middle quintile. Additional adjustment for BMI diluted these associations. Fracture risk was reduced in these subjects. Significant interaction was present between intake of retinol and overweight (BMI >25…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,288 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free