Evidence Hub

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on serum uric acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Hu X, Yang Y, Hu X, Jia X, Liu H, Wei M, Lyu Z

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022

4,218 participants · 50 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aims The present study aims to determine the effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT‐2) inhibitors on the serum uric acid (SUA) levels of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Asia. Methods PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of SGLT‐2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM up to 15 July 2021, without language or date restrictions. Results In total, 19 high‐quality studies (4218 participants) were included in the present network meta‐analysis. All of the included SGLT‐2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, ipragliflozin, luseogliflozin and tofogliflozin) significantly decreased SUA levels compared with those of the control [total standard mean difference –0.965, 95% CI (−1.029, −0.901), p = .000, I 2 = 98.7%] in patients with T2DM. Subgroup analysis and meta‐regression showed that the combined analysis of different inhibitors might lead to heterogeneity of the results. Therefore, among the SGLT‐2 inhibitors, the results of the subsequent network meta‐analysis revealed that luseogliflozin and dapagliflozin ranked the highest in terms of lowering SUA levels among the SGLT‐2 inhibitors. Moreover, the network meta‐analysis declared that luseogliflozin (1 and 10 mg) and dapagliflozin (5 mg) led to a superior reduction in SUA in patients with T2DM. Conclusions SGLT‐2 inhibitors could significantly reduce SUA levels in patients with T2DM, particularly luseogliflozin (1 and 10…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,218 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free