Evidence Hub

The association between bacteria colonizing the upper respiratory tract and lower respiratory tract infection in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S. Claassen-Weitz, Katherine Y. L. Lim, Christopher A. Mullally, H. Zar, M. Nicol

Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2021

75 citations

Abstract

Background Bacteria colonizing the upper respiratory tract (URT) of young children play a key role in the pathogenesis of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Objectives To systematically review the literature on the association between bacteria colonizing the URT and LRTI among young children. Data sources MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, Africa-Wide Information and CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria Studies published between 1923 and 2020, investigating URT bacteria from LRTI cases and controls. Participants Children under 5 years with and without acute LRTI. Methods Three reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Meta-analysis was done using Mantel–Haenszel fixed- or random-effects models. Results Most eligible studies (41/50) tested nasopharyngeal specimens when investigating URT bacteria. Most studies were of cross-sectional design (44/50). Twenty-four studies were performed in children in lower- or lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). There was higher prevalence of Haemophilus influenzae (pooled OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.23–2.07) and Klebsiella spp. (pooled OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.17–3.55) from URT specimens of cases versus controls. We observed a positive association between the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae from URT specimens and LRTI after excluding studies where there was more antibiotic treatment prior to sampling in cases vs. controls (pooled OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.04–1.90). High density colonization with S.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free