Evidence Hub

Are SGLT2 inhibitors really associated with increased urinary tract infection risk? A trial-level meta-analysis across type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease

Matteucci A, Di Fusco SA, Bonanni M, Castello L, Aquilani S, Fedele S, Nardi F, Colivicchi F

Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2026

62,542 participants

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established therapies across the cardiovascular-renal continuum. Although the excess risk of external genital infection is well recognized, the association between SGLT2 inhibition and urinary tract infection (UTI), particularly serious/complicated urinary infection, remains uncertain.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, ertugliflozin, and bexagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or heart failure. Co-primary urinary safety outcomes were any UTI and serious/complicated urinary infection, the latter defined using directly reported serious UTI endpoints or the closest reported severe urinary phenotype. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analyses by drug and population, leave-one-out analyses, and exploratory meta-regression were performed.

Results: A total of 14 studies were included. For the primary any-UTI analysis, 11 studies contributed data, comprising 62,542 participants and 4,685 events. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a pooled RR of 1.14 (95% CI 0.99-1.32; P = 0.073), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=76.0%). In the prespecified sensitivity analysis excluding reconstructed CANVAS estimates, 10 studies comprising 52,400 participants and 4,019 events yielded a pooled RR of 1.08 (95% CI 1.00-1.18; P = 0.060), with lower heterogeneity (I²=23.3%). For the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 62,542 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free