Evidence Hub

Sanjin tablet combined with antibiotics for treating patients with acute lower urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis and GRADE evidence profile

Jian Lyu, Yan-ming Xie, Menghua Sun, Cheng Zhang, Lian-Xin Wang

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2019

790 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Numerous clinical studies have evaluated the performance of Sanjin tablets (SJTs) in the treatment of acute lower urinary tract infections (ALUTIs) in China. The present meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of SJT combined with antibiotics for the treatment of patients with ALUTIs and to evaluate the quality of evidence. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Chinese BioMedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang and VIP databases were searched for entries added between inception and December 2018 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Traditional Chinese Medicine were used for assessing the methodological quality and reporting quality of eligible studies, respectively. Meta-analysis and quality of evidence assessment were performed with RevMan 5.3 and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), respectively. A total of 8 RCTs comprising 790 patients with ALUTIs were included in the present meta-analysis. The cure rate of SJTs combined with gatifloxacin tablets (GTs) was higher than that of GTs alone [relative ratio (RR)=1.30, 95% CI=1.07–1.57, P=0.009]. The cure rate of SJTs combined with levofloxacin tablets (LTs) was higher than that of LTs alone (RR=1.13, 95% CI=1.04–1.24, P=0.006). SJTs combined with LTs was better in improving the total effective rate than LTs alone (RR=1.11, 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 790 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free