Evidence Hub

Systematic Review: Antimicrobial Urinary Catheters To Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Hospitalized Patients

James R. Johnson, M. Kuskowski, T. Wilt

Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006

900,000 participants · 343 citations

Abstract

Key Summary Points Randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials of antimicrobial urinary catheters currently marketed in the United States (i.e., nitrofurazone-coated and silver alloycoated catheters) provide little or no data on these devices' effect on symptomatic urinary tract infection, morbidity, secondary bloodstream infection, mortality rates, or associated health care costs. Both nitrofurazone-coated and silver alloycoated catheters seem to reduce the development of asymptomatic bacteriuria during short-term (<30 days) use, in comparison with latex or silicone control catheters. The magnitude of this effect varies among studies, seemingly in relation to the type of antimicrobial catheter (nitrofurazone or silver), patient sample (urology or other), control group bacteriuria rate (high or low), and type of control catheter (latex or silicone). No trials directly compared nitrofurazone-coated and silver alloycoated catheters. Therefore, assessments of the comparative efficacy of nitrofurazone-coated and silver alloycoated catheters should be made cautiously. The clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial urinary catheters must be assessed in well-designed, adequately powered, randomized clinical trials. Indwelling urinary catheters, which are used in 15% to 25% of short-term care patients during their hospitalization, confer a predisposition to bacteriuria (1-3). Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common type of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 900,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free