Evidence Hub

Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Mortality Across Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Movila DE, Motofelea AC, Dragan SR, Schiller A, Ionac A, Motofelea N, Caruntu F

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors offer glucose-lowering, cardio-protective and reno-protective properties. Mortality rates constitute a central endpoint for understanding the overall clinical value of SGLT2 inhibitors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare mortality outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitors across different populations. A systematic search was performed in four databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS) and Cochrane CENTRAL-in March 2025. We strictly included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared patients who received SGLT2is to control patients regarding mortality outcomes. All-cause mortality up to one year, all-cause mortality more than one year, cardiovascular mortality, renal mortality and in-hospital mortality were the extracted outcomes. Finally, RevMan (5.4) was adopted for meta-analysis, and OpenMeta analyst software was adopted for meta-regression. Fifty clinical trials met the eligibility criteria of the current systematic review and meta-analysis. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced all-cause mortality in studies with follow-up of up to one year (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.80-0.99], p = 0.03). This early survival benefit was primarily driven by the subgroup of patients treated during acute cardiac decompensation (RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.60-0.97], p = 0.03). Furthermore, long-term follow-up beyond one year showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.85-0.94], p p <…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free