Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus levofloxacin (500 mg) in plasma and urine of male and female healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose

Wagenlehner FM, Kinzig-Schippers M, Tischmeyer U, Wagenlehner C, Sörgel F, Dalhoff A, Naber KG

International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2006

12 participants

Abstract

The new extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin XR) was designed for once-daily administration in the treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI). The aim of this study was to compare concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion (UE) and pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus those of levofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose. In this randomised crossover study, 12 volunteers (6 males, 6 females) received a single oral dose of 1000 mg ciprofloxacin XR or 500 mg levofloxacin to assess the concentrations (by high-pressure liquid chromatography) in plasma up to 32 h and the UE at intervals up to 36 h. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were studied: C(max), t(max), t(1/2), AUC(plasma0-->infinity), AUC(plasma0-->last), Cl(ren), maximal urinary concentration (U(max)), AUC(urine0-->last) and UE. Both fluoroquinolones were well tolerated. The plasma concentrations of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin XR throughout the study period. The urinary concentrations of ciprofloxacin XR were significantly higher than those of levofloxacin in the first collection interval (0-4 h), whereas the concentrations of levofloxacin were significantly higher than those of ciprofloxacin XR in the five last collection intervals (12-36 h). The median proportions of cumulative renal excretion of the administered dose of the parent drug up to 36 h were 43.1% for ciprofloxacin XR (range,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free