Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of novel antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis

Zhu X, Wang X, Zhang P, Yang Z, Zhao N, Li J, Shi Y, Zhao Y et al.

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

39,844 participants

Abstract

Background: A number of novel antidiabetic drugs have been developed. These drugs include sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is). However, the optimal medication for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been established. To this end, this study was conducted to compare specific novel antidiabetic drugs regarding efficacy and safety.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for publications dated as of July 9, 2025. Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0 (RoB 2.0) was applied to measure the quality of the publications, and R 4.2.2 and Stata 15.1 were used to execute a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Primary outcomes encompassed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), composite renal outcomes, and all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes comprised adverse events (AEs), hypoglycemia, and cardiovascular death.

Results: This NMA incorporated 30 studies, involving 39,844 participants with T2DM and comorbid CKD. The interventions were ranked by performance in various outcomes using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Sotagliflozin ranked first in reducing MACEs (SUCRA: 90.57%). Empagliflozin ranked first in improving composite renal outcomes (SUCRA: 89.76%) and reducing ACM (SUCRA: 72.38%). Canagliflozin ranked first in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 39,844 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free