Evidence Hub

Oral gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in Japanese female patients: a randomized, active reference, double-blind, double-dummy, Phase 3 trial (EAGLE-J)

Shingo Yamamoto, Kenji Fujii, Yoko Kayama, Akinori Nimura, T. Maenaka, Marcela Ramírez, Rudrani Banerjee, N. Scangarella-Oman et al.

Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 2025

108 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two global Phase 3 trials, EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3, found gepotidacin non-inferior (and superior in EAGLE-3) to nitrofurantoin for the treatment of uUTI in female participants, with an acceptable safety profile; however, these studies did not include Japanese centers.

METHODS

EAGLE-J (NCT05630833; jRCT2031220467) was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active reference study evaluating the efficacy and safety of gepotidacin for the treatment of uUTI in Japan. Eligible participants were females aged ≥12 years with ≥2 uUTI symptoms and urinary nitrite or pyuria. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) oral gepotidacin (1500 mg) or nitrofurantoin (100 mg) twice daily for 5 days. To bridge data, consistency of therapeutic response at test-of-cure (day 10-13) in the gepotidacin arm of EAGLE-J with EAGLE-2/EAGLE-3 was assessed in participants with qualifying nitrofurantoin-susceptible uropathogens (≥105 colony-forming units/mL). Therapeutic success comprised clinical (symptom resolution) and microbiological success (eradication). Consistency was claimed if the therapeutic success rate in EAGLE-J was greater than the consistency threshold predicted from EAGLE-2/EAGLE-3.

FINDINGS

Overall, the primary analysis included 108 participants (83 gepotidacin, 25 nitrofurantoin). At test-of-cure, gepotidacin therapeutic success was 83.1 % (69/83), exceeding the consistency threshold (48.2 %). Adverse events were mostly mild-to-moderate; common adverse events were diarrhea…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 108 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free