Evidence Hub

PD18-10 the itind temporarily implanted nitinol device for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

B. Chughtai, D. Elterman, N. Shore, M. Gittleman, J. Motola, S. Pike, C. Hermann, William Terrens et al.

Urology, 2020

175 participants · 88 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with a temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTind; Medi-Tate Ltd, Hadera, Israel) compared to sham for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men 50 years or older were randomized 2:1 between iTind and sham procedure arms. A self-expanding, temporary nitinol device was placed for 5 to 7 days and an 18F Foley catheter was inserted and removed for the iTind and sham group, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline, 1.5, 3, and 12 months post-operatively using the IPSS, peak urinary flow rate (PFR), residual urine, quality of life (QoL), and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Unblinding occurred at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 175 men (mean age 61.1±6.5) participated (118 iTind vs 57 sham). 78.6% of patients in the iTind arm showed a reduction of ≥3 points in IPSS, versus 60% of patients in the control arm at 3 months. At 12 months, the iTind group reported a 9.25 decrease in IPSS (p<0.0001), a 3.52ml/s increase in PFR (p<0.0001) and a 1.9-point reduction in QoL (p<0.0001). Adverse events were typically mild and transient, most Clavien-Dindo grade I or II, in 38.1% of patients in the iTind arm and 17.5% in the control arm. No de novo ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the second-generation iTind provided rapid and sustained improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 175 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free