Evidence Hub

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Treating Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Pilot Study for an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

J. Tornic, M. Liechti, Stephanie A. Stalder, V. Birkhäuser, S. van der Lely, L. Leitner, U. Mehnert, T. Kessler

European Urology Focus, 2019

15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) is an effective and safe treatment for idiopathic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), but its value in neurological patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind transcutaneous TNS (TTNS) setup for treating neurogenic LUTD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A pilot study including nine patients with refractory neurogenic LUTD investigated prospectively at a university neuro-urology department.

INTERVENTION

Randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind verum and sham TTNS was performed for 30min twice a week, for 6 wks.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, and safety of the TTNS protocol. Secondarily, potential efficacy was investigated. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

All procedures were feasible and well tolerated by all nine patients. Using verum TTNS, a motor response could be triggered in all patients and a sensory response in all but one. At the beginning and end of treatment, seven and six (78% and 67%) patients believed to receive verum TTNS, and five and six (56% and 67%) correctly guessed their group allocation, respectively. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. A comparison of baseline versus 6 wks of verum and sham TTNS led to relevant symptom and functional changes in only a limited number of piloted patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Verum and sham TTNS combined with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free