Evidence Hub

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lin CC, Sung HL, Huang PY, Lai CC, Wei YF, Fu PK

The Journal of international medical research, 2026

1,986 participants

Abstract

ObjectiveSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are widely used in the management of diabetes mellitus and have demonstrated substantial cardiovascular and renal protective effects, particularly in patients with heart failure. However, their impact on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains insufficiently characterized.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The primary outcome was the composite cardiovascular outcome (defined as cardiovascular mortality and total hospitalization for heart failure). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and adverse events.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials involving 1986 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included; in total, 1113 patients received sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment and 873 received placebo. Compared with the placebo, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome (risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.87; p p p = 0.23) and cardiovascular death (risk ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.24; p = 0.73) were observed. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,986 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free