Evidence Hub

Prevalence and outcomes of Urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacterales resistant to third-generation cephalosporins in the Emergency Department: results from UTILY cohort, a prospective multicentre study

C. Monari, Lorenzo Onorato, A. Cornelli, M. Macera, E. Allegorico, A. Ferraro, Carmine Nasta, Maria Teresa Florio et al.

Infection, 2025

288 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

In accordance with the spread of drug-resistant bacteria worldwide, an increase in the prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) among pathogens causing urinary tract infections (UTIs) has been described globally. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and outcome of UTIs caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC-R) Enterobacterales in a prospective cohort of patients admitted to Emergency Department (ED). We conducted an observational prospective multicentre study, involving 7 healthcare facilities, enrolling all consecutive adult patients admitted to ED with a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis of UTIs caused by Enterobacterales. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of UTIs caused by 3GC-R Enterobacterales, and 30-day mortality. During the study period, we included 288 patients with urinary tract infection: 41.7% of subjects were males, median age was 72 years (IQR 56–81). The most frequently isolated pathogen was Escherichia coli (70.5%); 35.9% of all pathogens isolated were non-susceptible to 3GC. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, admission to a hospital (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.41–7.75, p = 0.006) or a long-term care facility (OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.16–20.36, p = 0.03) in the previous three months was independently associated with isolation of a 3GC-R pathogen. Regarding the clinical outcomes, 22 out of 217 (10.1%) patients completing follow-up died at 30 days. At multivariate analysis 7-day clinical response was the only variable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 288 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free