Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes of Single-Dose Flomoxef Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Study of 834 Cases

Sugihara N, Sawada T, Arai H, Nishida K, Ohnishi T, Watanabe R, Nishimura K, Fukumoto T et al.

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026

834 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prostate biopsy remains essential for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although the transperineal approach is increasingly favored, transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) continues to be performed in many institutions. In our institution, single-dose flomoxef (FMOX) was introduced as a prophylactic antibiotic in response to increasing resistance to levofloxacin (LVFX). This study evaluated the effectiveness and microbiological validity of FMOX using real-world clinical data.

METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 834 patients who underwent TRPB under single-dose intravenous FMOX (1 g) between 2015 and 2024. The clinical outcomes were acute prostatitis and sepsis within 4 weeks after biopsy. Post-biopsy bacteriuria was evaluated as an exploratory microbiological outcome. Pathogen distribution was described among patients with identified organisms, and factors associated with post-biopsy bacteriuria were evaluated using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS: Among 834 patients, prostatitis occurred in 0.5% of patients; no cases of sepsis were observed. Post-biopsy bacteriuria was observed in 6.5% of patients. Among 31 cases with identified pathogens, Enterococcus faecalis was the most common (54.8%), whereas Escherichia coli accounted for 12.9% of cases. Multivariable analysis identified prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score, and constipation as independent risk factors for post-biopsy bacteriuria.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 834 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free