Evidence Hub

Impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on heart failure outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bhalraam U, Veerni RB, Paddock S, Meng J, Piepoli M, López-Fernández T, Tsampasian V, Vassiliou VS

European journal of preventive cardiology, 2026

88 participants · 38 citations

Abstract

AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recognized for their cardiovascular benefits. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of SGLT2i on heart failure (HF) outcomes in cancer patients and survivors, focusing on HF hospitalization and new HF diagnoses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase via Ovid, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to 5 June 2024, focusing on studies involving cancer patients and survivors treated with SGLT2i. The search criterion used was [(SGLT2) OR (Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) OR (canagliflozin) OR (dapagliflozin) OR (empagliflozin) OR (ertugliflozin) AND (cancer)]. The primary outcomes assessed were HF hospitalization and new HF diagnoses. The search yielded 1880 studies, from which 13 studies encompassing 88 273 patients were included. SGLT2i use reduced HF hospitalizations by 51% (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, I² = 28%, P < 0.01) and new HF diagnoses by 71% (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.87, I² = 71%). Multi-variate meta-regression analysis suggested that among breast cancer populations, studies with ≥50% of patients on anthracyclines exhibited a 99% reduction in HF hospitalization risk compared with similar studies that included <50% of patients on anthracyclines (RR 0.0085, 95% CI: 0.0001-0.2645, P = 0.0081).

CONCLUSION

SGLT2i significantly lower the risk of HF hospitalization and new HF diagnoses among cancer patients and survivors, with particularly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 88 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free